THE world is a crazy place at the moment.
Whether it’s global pandemics, wholly unqualified leaders of nations or Liverpool dropping points at Anfield, this world is not the one we once knew.
OK, that may be an overreaction to the Champions drawing at home to Burnley at the weekend, but it did bring with it an unsettling feeling. It was unfamiliar, and yet familiar.
The talk afterwards of Liverpool taking their foot off the pedal after winning the title, or Sean Dyche’s men ‘doing a job’ on them (having a good goalkeeper is not a tactic) were trite and ill-thought out. It appeared to be as simple as Jürgen Klopp’s side merely having ‘one of those days’.
That is not to say they were just unlucky, though. The primary reason Liverpool dropped two points, losing the opportunity to record a 100 per cent win ratio at Anfield in the Premier League in this historic season, was simply because of their own profligacy in front of goal. They created chances, far more than they had against Aston Villa six days prior when they had run out 2-0 winners, but this time they fluffed their lines at almost every opportunity.
The coaches and analysts will tell you that there were more concerns about the overall performance against Villa than against Burnley, but the one stat that was down in the Burnley game was, as the old saying goes, the only one that matters.
Nick Pope was in good form, but The Reds had enough opportunities to give the England keeper no chance. As it was, every effort barring Andy Robertson’s header gave Pope a sniff, which he sniffed well.
One plus point from the game was Curtis Jones, who was excellent on his full league debut. The signs are there that he is going to take to senior football like a duck to water (because ducks aren’t that great at footy), but he too was guilty of overcomplicating the bit where you put the ball in the net. His lack of experience is very much a reasonable excuse, though.
Roberto Firmino has received some criticism for producing yet another goalless performance at home. Martin Tyler on commentary pointed out the Brazilian’s scoring drought in his home stadium on more than one occasion, saying how strange it was for a ‘number nine’ to not be banging them in regularly, fundamentally misunderstanding the role Firmino plays.
Khalid Boulahrouz wore the number 9 at Chelsea and didn’t score a single goal for the London club, primarily because the Dutchman was a defender, but commentators and rival supporters presumably were still giving him all sorts of pelters for it.
To some, Firmino’s goal record (or lack of) is enough evidence to suggest there is a problem. To others, there is no problem.
Melissa Reddy produced an excellent piece for The Independent yesterday that covered all the reasons for the latter, but there will inevitably always be questions asked of an attacking player when they go on such a barren run.
You could see in the Villa game what that difference is. Liverpool without Firmino on the pitch were lacklustre, without direction and an absolute shell of the team that has won the title so comprehensively. As soon as Firmino came on, everything made sense again. It was like putting your winter coat for the first time in months. Familiar, snug, and here’s a tenner in the pocket I’d forgotten about!
Despite the disappointment and audible frustration at the Burnley result (not least from Andy ‘what is the fuckin’ point of ye!?’ Robertson) it was a complete outlier, so not too much can be read into it, but the reason Liverpool are where they are is because they have been so consistently ahead of the curve, solving problems before they’ve even become problems.
They will not see Saturday as ‘one of them’. They will be analysing the reasons why it happened, and addressing them.
One notable aspect of the game was that Liverpool were chasing a goal for over 20 minutes after Rodriguez equalised. And yet, with Divock Origi and Takumi Minamino on the bench, Klopp instead turned to his right back and midfielders. Alexander-Arnold, Naby Keita and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain came on to provide more ammo to Mane, Firmino and Mo Salah, rather than adding an extra gun at the top end.
It could have worked. All three played well, and Trent’s cross in the final minute should have set Salah up for a winner, but it didn’t happen.
The club’s pursuit of Timo Werner, even if they ultimately decided the money wasn’t justified, suggests that they see there is an issue with having three elite forwards, and then a big drop off.
Minamino is a project, but Origi seems to be the bigger question mark. A man whose primary use in the past has been as an impact sub when his team needs a goal from nowhere, was not trusted to do so on Saturday, and you could argue that decision was justified.
What Origi did last season was phenomenal. To consistently change games, and the biggest of games, from nowhere was invaluable. Without his contributions, Liverpool would not have won the Champions League, or come as close as they did to Manchester City in the title race.
This season though, Origi has had very little impact. A good showing on the opening day against Norwich and his standard humbling of Everton in the Anfield derby aside, the Belgian has simply not produced. He is also very unlike Firmino in that, if the goals aren’t coming, you don’t really see many other benefits to him being on the pitch.
In the league this season, Origi has made six starts and 19 sub appearances, and bagged just three times. He is a player who is in a strange position of arguably deserving a statue more than a starting place.
Whatever the club decides to do in the transfer window with however little money they have to spend, arguably their most interesting move will be in attack. Was Werner seen as a one off, just a player Klopp liked who was available? Or was he the top of the list of a type of player that the club wants to add?
Perhaps giving Rhian Brewster a chance next season is on the manager’s mind. The 20-year old has impressed during his half-season loan spell at Swansea, and could be ready to be given a chance to put his name among the other exciting young English prospects in the Premier League.
After last night, I would very much be on board with the idea of giving Wycombe striker and Reds fan Adebayo Akinfenwa a one-year deal, if only because the ‘Inside Training’ videos on the club website would become essential viewing.
We’ll find out in the weeks that follow the end of the campaign what the ultimate plans are, and games like Saturday might happen again, but if Liverpool have done one thing in the last year it has been to show that you don’t have to settle for ‘one of those days’.
You can do something about it, and perhaps Arsenal will find that out on Wednesday night.
For instant reaction to all the Liverpool news and events that matter to you, subscribe to The Anfield Wrap…
“There’s an argument to say fuck the points total, this should be a procession of celebrating that we’ve won a League with seven games to go.” 🏆
— The Anfield Wrap (@TheAnfieldWrap) July 13, 2020
Listen 👉 https://t.co/QiKp8xyHSb
Download Our App 👉 https://t.co/yTcwWTIbIT pic.twitter.com/4elBPS76M5
Liverpool should be looking to fine tune what they have…. a backup left back, a better striker option is all thats needed. quality players will cost, but it is an investment – not a spend.
You’re just transferring the assets from cash to players. The cost is just agents fees and depreciation cost on the balance sheet (i.e. the value of the player amortised over the contract length).
Surely FSG can see the logic in that. City will spend about 300m this summer – if FSG want to compete then they need to act. Don’t forget, we’ve not bought a 1st 11 player for 2 seasons
Yes, definitely need another quality attacking player. Our fab front 3 have been looking a bit stale lately and where would we be if one of them got injured. We have been lucky in that respect so far but it cannot last forever.
You need to strengthen when you are on top. I know it is going back a long way, and if you are of a certain age, you will not remember it, but the last time we were at he summit of the game was the 1988 season. We had swept all before us with the Barnes, Beardsley, Aldridge axis and, as far as the transfer market was concerned, stood still. I think the point has already bee made, if you are looking at the subs bench, i don’t think you have to much to fear.
Just found out that the rebate that F$G have to pay back to Sky has been deferred to the 2020/2021 season….. so there’s next summers excuse for not buying anyone!!!!
Would Liverpool benefit from having another top quality attacking player? Of course. It’s clear that they had plans to add one, but Covid and the postponement of African Cup of Nations have obviously caused a rethink.
A lot of the discussion on transfers taking place elsewhere doesn’t address the realities Liverpool have to deal with, and also pays no attention to the particular position some of our rivals are in.
People need to remember FFP (it’s still a thing, despite the City CAS ruling) and the Premier Leagues own rules relating to financial sustainability mean that no owner can simply pump money in to a club to buy players. A clubs revenue has to support the salaries and player purchases. This is a reality for Chelsea and City, as much as it is for us. It is the existence of these rules that has lead to City (allegedly) disguising owner contributions as revenue.
People can look at Chelsea and assume that they are spending like crazy and that they will be a threat next season. We need to remember Chelsea had a transfer ban since they got the Hazard money in and have just sold Morata. They are also about to lose two top quality forwards in Willian and Pedro who will have been on high wages.
Plenty of people are assuming City will invest heavily this summer, but where is the hard news to back that up? They have lost Sane and Silva, so I’m sure they will looking to bring someone in, but who’s to say they will be stronger as a result.
Unlike our rivals Liverpool are not losing key attacking players this summer, so our need for additions is less. If Liverpool do bring a couple of additions in, great, but I think we will again see the benefit of continuity and will see an incremental improvement from a number players.
FSG have not pumped any money into LFC.only what we generate. Covid has reduced what we generate. Surely now is the time for them to spend some of their own cash to safeguard an asset whilst it’s at the top? Otherwise when would you do it? FFP has been suspended for 2 seasons!
FFP isn’t being suspended at all. Rather the the 2019-20 and 2020-21 seasons are being treated as a single accounting period for the purpose of break even calculations. This doesn’t provide an opportunity for club owners to pump loads of money in to club to purchase players, but it might allow clubs to smooth the impact of lost match day and TV revenue.
https://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/about-uefa/news/025e-0fb60fd017ba-82857c2a2217-1000–temporary-emergency-measures-for-financial-fair-play/