SUBMERGED in the Brazilian brilliance and the heroics of our Belgian ‘keeper at Stoke, was the return of Daniel Sturridge — a man who if back pages and Twitter timelines are to believed, is on his way out of Anfield, writes GREG STANLEY.
He looked hungry when he came on. His movement off the ball was refreshing for a tired Liverpool side, helping Philippe Coutinho find space in which to play in. Shortly after crossing the white lines and entering the game, it was Sturridge’s ambitious through ball that found Roberto Firmino in acres of space, starting the move which eventually lead to an equaliser that hadn’t seemed imminent until his introduction.
The 45 goals that Sturridge has scored for the club bring with them a reputation — his face is still one of the most recognisable in English football and, for all his problems with injury, he’s just as likely to bend one into the top corner as he is to limp out of a game. It feels like an eternity ago, but just last year this was a man who scored perhaps one of Liverpool’s greatest goals in a European final, though it would eventually lead to nothing after a second half collapse from the Reds.
Even after that flash of brilliance Sturridge was being linked to clubs such as PSG and West Ham, though no move ever came to fruition for one reason or another.
There appear to be many reasons behind the general consensus that Sturridge’s days at Liverpool are numbered — his proneness to injury being the main one. His infamous struggles have cast a shadow over his career at the club to date and continue to be at the forefront of many people’s consideration where the player is concerned. It’s no surprise therefore that Sturridge, signed in the same month as Coutinho back in 2013, has played just 114 games for the club in all competitions compared to the 175 times his Brazilian team-mate has taken to the field.
Yet when he has been on the pitch, he has proved to be a somewhat reliable source of goals. Twenty-one of his 45 league strikes came in that 2013-14 season as a pacey, intricately skilled and intelligent forward. That scoring record was only bettered by strike partner Luis Suarez — not just at the club but in the entirety of the Premier League. A late winner against Southampton on the opening day of the following season suggested more of the same was to come from Sturridge as he carried the burden of goal scoring that Suarez’s departure left.
However, as is so often the case with the Premier League’s international stars, England came calling and with that came injury followed by months of setbacks. Nothing was seen of our striker bar the odd Instagram post and he would take part in just 18 of Liverpool’s 58 games that season.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbbBeJhNG_k
Without his goals, and with little help from the likes of Mario Balotelli and Rickie Lambert, Rodgers’ side really struggled. An almost complete juxtaposition of the season that came before it, the Reds scored just 52 goals compared with 101 in 2013-14 and ended up hobbling over the line licking their wounds after a horrific final day defeat at Stoke.
Keeping in theme, he’d alternate between scoring goals and being injured until the end of Rodgers’ tenure and well into Jürgen Klopp’s, a manager who remarked about the striker needing to learn the difference between “what is serious pain and what is only pain”. These comments raised some questions about the striker’s mentality and his role at the club, though it soon became clear that the German and his staff valued Sturridge’s importance by micro-managing his game time to increase his robustness. That decision bore fruit towards the back end of last season with the striker notching eight goals from March through till the campaign’s conclusion.
Prior to this season there were hopes that Sturridge would rediscover his best form, having seemingly managed to successfully navigate a full pre-season programme, however those hopes were eventually put to bed when the striker suffered a hip injury just prior to the friendly clash with Barcelona at Wembley. While it seemed the end of the world at the time, the striker would return in time for Liverpool’s first away trip to Turf Moor and would stay clear of the treatment table until mid-November. It did genuinely seem that Sturridge had put the worst of his problems behind him, that was until illness saw him sent home from a warm weather training camp in La Manga and he then suffered a hip injury as he recovered from that illness.
His most recent comeback seemed timely given Liverpool’s attempts to arrest their New Year slump and aim for a top four finish. At home to Bournemouth, with the number 15 sat on the bench, Klopp looked towards a change of formation to help Liverpool control the game, although it seemed there were a lot of tired legs left to stem the tide of Bournemouth’s long balls and throws that eventually led to an equaliser. The ever-teasing looking glass of hindsight suggests that maybe reintroducing Sturridge into the side would have been a better idea. In his post-match conference, though, Klopp claimed that it was ‘too early’ for him to enter the game with half an hour remaining, the point at which Joel Matip replaced Coutinho.
With that collapse in the rear-view mirror, all three of Klopp’s next substitutions made a much more telling impact. The Brazilians, Coutinho and Firmino entered the fray at Stoke City with Liverpool one goal down and staring towards another bleak day at the grubby hands of Jonathan Walters. They changed the game, anyone between the Bet365 Stadium, Twitter timelines and Match of the Day Two could see that. Sturridge’s impact, though not directly leading to a goal as with the others, spoke volumes about what he can still bring to the team.
As he edges towards full fitness (for now, at least), and Liverpool edge towards securing a spot in the top four, now is when we will find out if Sturridge has a future at Liverpool Football Club. Top scorer Sadio Mane heads the list of injuries, having been ruled out for eight weeks after surgery on his knee, and clever footballers will be needed to pick up as many points as possible in the run-in.
With West Brom away this weekend, The Hawthorns might be the setting of a resurgence in the career of what is undoubtedly a very, very talented footballer. Whether he is playing in order to attract potential suitors this summer, or to fight for his place at a club where he’s now spent as much of his time playing as anywhere else, the business end of this season is a chance for Sturridge to deliver the goods — and it’s a chance he might just go on and take.
Recent Posts:
[rpfc_recent_posts_from_category meta=”true”]
Pics: David Rawcliffe-Propaganda Photo
He defined the term “impact” in the Stoke game, and we lack players who can be subbed on and make an impact. Then look at his cash value and I think he is still very much a Liverpool player.
We couldn’t replace him for what we would get.
Time for him to go. I think he’s brilliant, but he’s not offering us anything. His lack of reliability makes us fail to prepare, which means we’re preparing to fail.
And that pass against Stoke the weekend. Those passes happen at every ground every weekend.
A couple of things, Klopp said he wasn’t ready and I’ve no reason to doubt that. My feeling though, is Klopp wants to send a message to Sturridge that his future is elsewhere and make sure he doesn’t get injured. Someone will take a punt on him now. They won’t if he’s out for 6 months.
The message may be necessary because of his wages. He may have to take a cut to go elsewhere.
The other thing is, I saw the comment above that we wouldn’t get anyone as good for the money we’d get for him. I completely agree with that but I think the transfer fee is irrelevant. It’s about his wages. Klopp may think we can have another player on £150k a week who we get more from. Whatever the reasons Sturridge has averaged 4.66 league goals a season. He’s had £24m in wages in that time. It’s not far off £1.5m per goal. He’s pure quality but is he viable for a club like us? It appears Klopp doesn’t fancy him so I think that’s that.
**4.66 league goals a season over the past 3 seasons.
Daniel Sturridge is a fabulously talented, genuinely ‘mecurial’ talent; a dream stiker who can score breathtaking goals (my favourite is still the volleyed lob from outside the area again Everton). He glides across the pitch, has wonderful football intelligence, oozes class, and has a genuine rock star aloofness.
However, his injury ‘problems’ have decimated his pace – he seems to have ‘racehorse’ fitness – Supreme athleticism but very highly strung. As Robin has pointed out he sucking £150k a week and returning very little now.
Should the club move him on and use that wage to throw £200k at Lacazette or sone other football manager striker the poster’s on sites like TIA wank on about? I’m truly torn. He just may turn out to be a Defoe and bang in 15-20 goals a season while playing 50% of games. Is £150k over the top for part-time impact sub – probably. Is it worth it for 15-20 goals a seaon for the next 5-7 years – probably. Frankly, I wish we were rich enough to keep him and bring in a young high end line-leading striker.
Last season Defoe played 33 league games. This season he’s played 29. I’m not sure there’s a striker out there scoring 15 goals in 19 League games.
Sunderland play far fewer games than we’d conceivably play from next season – possibly 60 plus. So, like Defoe, Sturridge playing up to 30-35 games in a support role – starting – and more as an impact sub.
Daniel’s goal scoring record, with better supply now, its quite feasible to model 15-20 goals. Daniel is a auperior striker to almost all in the league. This is no certainty. Noth1inf is bit in terms of planning it’s a legitimate consideration.